Latest topics
» hello all
Sun Feb 07, 2016 12:41 am by Itsybitsy

» Members Forum Access
Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:14 pm by Ronab

» Holy Paladin (PPVKNIG)
Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:36 am by Guest

» Hunter MM Application.. Again :P (Accepted)
Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:29 am by Shadowhit

» Funny/good/lollong vids
Wed Nov 24, 2010 11:54 am by Kashah

» Eyara Discipline priest (Accepted)
Sun Nov 21, 2010 3:48 pm by Eyara

» manelin [shadow/Holy Priest] (Declined)
Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:53 am by Rigsby

» Non WoW related screens
Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:13 am by Guest

» Zabineth (shadow priest) (Accepted)
Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:15 am by Rigsby

Poll

Remove the forums we dont ever use?

71% 71% [ 5 ]
29% 29% [ 2 ]

Total Votes : 7


3.2 Warlock Changes

View previous topic View next topic Go down

3.2 Warlock Changes

Post  Ragingal on Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:24 am

Banish: Effect will now be canceled if Banish is recast on a banished target.
Soulshatter cooldown reduced to 3 minutes, down from 5 minutes
Talents
Affliction
Pandemic: Now also increases the critical damage bonus of Haunt by 100%.
Demonology
Fel Domination cooldown reduced to 3 minutes, down from 15 minutes.
Destruction
Empowered Imp: The warlock's critical hit chance is increased to 100%, up from 20% for the next spell cast after the Imp critically hits a target.
Fire and Brimstone: Reduced to 2/4/6/8/10% increased damage from Incinerate and Chaos Bolt on targets afflicted with Immolate, down from 3/6/9/12/15%.
Also
Glyph of Lifetap: Duration of the buff from this glyph increased to 40 seconds.
avatar
Ragingal
Eternals Member

Posts : 270
Join date : 2008-11-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: 3.2 Warlock Changes

Post  Ragingal on Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:38 am

I didn't really think warlocks needed that much changing, so im glad they havent re-invented the wheel for 3.2. Being able to cancel banish is nice, that's always annoyed me tbh, no more 'want me to rebanish?' over vent! Pandemic buffing Haunts Crit dmg is nice. Im not fully up on destro stuff so i dont know how much of an impact they will have on dps but it seems the empowered imp buff and the fire and brimstone nerf seem to suggest that blizzard are giving with 1 hand and taking away with the other!
Changing the glyph... why oh why? 20 seconds was just fine, i would find myself tapping every 20 seconds to keep my mana up, the only place i can see the 40 seconds being useful is in a fight like General where we would be using rank 1 tap for the buff and nothing else. I think we'll still be tapping every 20 secs or so, especially the demo/destro guys as their spells are pretty mana heavy.
avatar
Ragingal
Eternals Member

Posts : 270
Join date : 2008-11-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: 3.2 Warlock Changes

Post  Welshknight on Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:01 am

You cant cancel banish Razz But you can recast it on an already banished target, theres a diference, meaning i can chain cc a druid and not let him leave Treeform ^^

Plus the fel domination and pandemic is liks "jizz in my pants" stuff for pvp
avatar
Welshknight
Eternals Member

Posts : 260
Join date : 2008-11-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: 3.2 Warlock Changes

Post  Ragingal on Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:02 am

Ragingal wrote:Banish: Effect will now be canceled if Banish is recast on a banished target.

Hmmm, my reading of this is that if u cast banish on a target that is already banished, it will cancel the effect. Might be me misreading it tho...
avatar
Ragingal
Eternals Member

Posts : 270
Join date : 2008-11-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: 3.2 Warlock Changes

Post  Felhaya on Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:10 am

Ragingal wrote:
Ragingal wrote:Banish: Effect will now be canceled if Banish is recast on a banished target.

Hmmm, my reading of this is that if u cast banish on a target that is already banished, it will cancel the effect. Might be me misreading it tho...

think so too, so in pve you can break it whenever you want (which isn't possible atm, "immune"), and in pvp as well to use it as an interrupt as well (banish, and get him out immediatly as he was casting something)...
avatar
Felhaya
Eternals Member

Posts : 553
Join date : 2009-01-18
Age : 30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: 3.2 Warlock Changes

Post  Ragingal on Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:19 am

plus, even with DR it would be stupidly OP to be able to keep a tree druid in banish by chain casting it, i suppose it would give the druids the chance to faceroll a QQ post, they faceroll everything else!
avatar
Ragingal
Eternals Member

Posts : 270
Join date : 2008-11-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: 3.2 Warlock Changes

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum